A statewide hiring pace is not a clock for one occupation
Oregon's all-industry pace was 31.3 days in December 2025. That number is the same for every job in the state.
Oregon's hiring pace got pasted into a Portland lab req as if it were a promise. It isn't a promise. It's a statewide, all-industries figure, and it is the same number for a pharmacist, a housekeeper, and a nurse practitioner.
In December 2025, that Oregon pace was 31.3 days. California's, same series and same label, was 35.3 days. The U.S. all-industry pace was 37.8 days. Health care and social assistance, which is a national series and not a state one, ran 51.5 days. None of those clocks knows your offer, your shift, or your screen.
Use them as context. A state running faster or slower than the country is a reason to look again at the req, not a date you can give a hiring manager. The health care series being slower than the all-industry U.S. pace is also context. It still covers every clinical job and a lot of jobs that aren't clinical. It will not tell you whether the Portland pharmacist search is stalled on $140,910 or on a residency line you don't need.
What people do with the number
The misuse is specific. Someone puts 31.3 days on a slide titled with one occupation and one city, and the room treats it as a forecast for that req. Then a quiet month gets blamed on "the state," and the wage row stays shut. Oregon's pace doesn't know that clinical lab technologists in Portland earn a median of $83,010, or that the lower quarter there is essentially the national median. California's pace doesn't know that a nurse practitioner in San Jose earns $231,560. The pace can't be wrong about those facts. It was never about them.
If you cite it, cite it in one sentence and label it. Statewide, all industries, December 2025. If you cite health care, say the series is national. Then go back to the occupation. The decision is still the local median, the local share, and the offer you actually approved.
A faster state can still have a bad req
Oregon running inside the national pace is not permission to post a national wage and wait. A calm statewide number is how a weak offer gets a free pass. California running a bit quicker than Oregon doesn't make San Jose nurse practitioner pay any less local. You can lose a finalist in a "fast" state by sitting on the packet, and you can fill a req in a "slow" state the week the range matches the metro.
A month that runs long is still your req until the wage and the screen have been looked at. The pace also doesn't vary by city inside the state. Portland and every other Oregon metro share it. Pasting it onto one clinic's req pretends the clinic is the state.
Illustrative story
A director asked why the lab req had passed a month. The recruiter answered with Oregon's December pace and a shrug. The pace was real. It was also the pace for the whole state and every industry. The req itself was priced just over the national median for clinical lab technologists, which in Portland is the lower quarter, and the screen still listed an instrument the lab would have taught.
They took the state number off the debrief slide. In its place they put the local median and a yes-or-no on that instrument. The pace stayed in a footnote, labeled statewide, all industries. The req changed because the footnote couldn't hire anyone.
Use the state pace as a nudge to look again. Then go back to the occupation.
https://reqradius.com/hiring/methodology/
Sources
The same read for your own opening is a Hiring Pack.
First Hiring Pack free.
Then Was $24Now $0.99 per req report.
Or Was $149Now $19.99/month unlimited.